By using current case studies and advanced techniques, Omni’s EDI training programmes enable leadership teams to foster an inclusive environment within the workplace helping to retain and develop diverse talent.
Recruitment has never been more challenging; we think most people would agree with that statement. Once we finally have our shortlist, how do we ensure the selection process we are utilising is going to be predictive of performance? Organisations often rely on various predictors to assess a candidate’s potential for job performance; but are these the right predictors?
Our expert Omni Assessment team has explored findings from new research conducted by Sackett et al. (2022; 2023), which delves into the validity of these predictors in candidate selection. This research builds on the seminal work of Schmidt and Hunter (1998) and provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different predictors, including personality traits, emotional intelligence, situational judgement tests (SJTs), and cognitive ability, in predicting overall job performance.
We’re going to get into the details here; it’s important!
Schmidt and Hunter’s work on the relationship between predictors in the candidate selection process and job performance has been highly influential in the field of talent acquisition for over two decades. Most HR professionals have been quoting this study for years based on the immense attention it received, with over 6,500 citations. Building on this foundation, Sackett and his team conducted a critical analysis of existing research studies of candidate selection tools.
In their research, Sackett and colleagues found certain flaws with the statistical adjustments used in the earlier study, and as a result, conducted their own analysis. When doing so, they expanded the range of predictors studied beyond the original research work, including the Big 5 personality traits, emotional intelligence, and SJTs. Additionally, Sackett and his team addressed concerns for diversity and equitable outcomes in selection processes by including data on White-Black mean differences.
The central observation from the study is that commonly used predictors, on average, exhibit lower operational criterion-related validity for overall job performance than previously acknowledged. This implies that the factors we typically evaluate in candidates seem to have less accuracy in predicting job performance than we had previously assumed. Notably, even within their latest analysis, most rankings in terms of predictive capability remained consistent, with one of the most substantial shifts occurring in the ascendancy of structured interviews as the foremost individual predictor.
As a result of this, cognitive ability, which was previously considered a standout predictor, no longer holds the same prominence. Amazing results to think about, considering 75% of Fortune 500 organisations reportedly use cognitive ability tests as part of their selection process.
The research has important implications for talent acquisition practices:
The revised validity of cognitive ability tests has come as quite a shock for many in the industry, challenging the commonly held view that cognitive ability has high predictive capabilities. However, as pointed out by recent studies, the analysis done by Schmidt and Hunter relied on much older data (Griebe et al., 2022). In their own meta-analytical study, Griebe and colleagues found that cognitive ability, or the ‘g factor’ presents a significantly lower degree of accuracy in predicting job performance (r= .23 rather than .51).
At this point, many may be thinking, “So, what is the point of having cognitive tests?”, but when deciding on the effectiveness of an assessment tool, we also need to consider the wider context.
The comprehensive analysis conducted by Sackett and his team challenges prior assumptions about predictor validity in candidate selection. Although some predictors may not be as strong as once believed, the paper underscores the significance of considering the wider context when selecting a tool (e.g. with cognitive tests) and using the contextual information to tailor the selection process, aligning it with performance objectives. It’s also crucial to recognise that these findings pertain to individual predictors in isolation, and so the study emphasises the value of integrating multiple predictors, which would also, to an extent, address certain diversity concerns. Implementing these insights can lead to more effective talent acquisition and improved organisational performance.
Contact us for an informal chat if you’d like more information on this research, to find out more about the best tools for candidate selection and/or creating your own bespoke assessment programmes.
T: 0161 929 4343
E: insights@omnirms.com
Omni offers a comprehensive range of assessment solutions tailored to meet your organisation’s unique needs. Our services include custom assessment design, psychometric analysis, skills-based framework development, assessment centre design and delivery, development centres, expert assessor training, and flexible support. Whether you’re seeking to improve your hiring process or develop your existing talent, our evidence-based assessments ensure reliable and effective evaluation.
Absolutely. Omni’s development centres are specifically designed to unlock the potential of your existing employees. Our structured assessments, aligned to your internal frameworks, are designed to identify individuals’ strengths, skills gaps, and areas for improvement, informing targeted developmental activities that drive real impact on individual and organisational performance.
Our assessment solutions are designed to elevate your hiring process by identifying the best candidates based on their skills, potential, and fit for the role. We help you define the critical competencies required for success, develop tailored assessments that accurately evaluate these competencies, and provide deep insights into candidates’ aptitude and personality traits. This evidence-based approach improves productivity, reduces turnover, and ensures a positive candidate experience. There are several benefits that personality profiling can bring to the recruitment process, such as supporting inclusive hiring, improved decision making, and increased efficiency.
The Resourcing Effectiveness Assessment (REA) is a rapid and flexible audit of an organisation’s resourcing maturity. The REA takes an integrated approach with key data derived from surveying recent hires, regretted candidates, and hiring managers; focus groups with strategic leaders, hiring managers and HR/TA teams; align with desktop research. Evaluation uses Omni’s four-level maturity index across five key areas: Strategy, People & Experience, Process, Tech & Data and EDI, with a further 20 sub-categories.
At Omni, we prioritise an evidence-based approach that ensures reliable and effective assessment processes. Our team of expert Organisational Psychologists brings extensive experience in designing and delivering robust assessments that are inclusive, skills-focused, and tailored to your unique organisational needs. We also offer flexibility and support throughout the assessment process, ensuring successful implementation and tangible results.